Verschwörungstheorien als argumentative Narrative
نویسندگان
چکیده
Zusammenfassung Der vorliegende Beitrag nimmt die Spezifik verschwörungstheoretischer Erzählungen in den Blick. Insbesondere Auseinandersetzung mit Begriffen ›Erzählung‹ und ›Topos‹ sowie im Anschluss an interdisziplinäre Forschungsansätze zu Verschwörungstheorien wird herausgearbeitet, dass grundsätzlich argumentativ aufgebaut sind. Am Beispiel des Videos »Gates kapert Deutschland!« von Ken Jebsen der Zusammenhang zwischen Erzählung Argumentation veranschaulicht.
منابع مشابه
Evaluating Argumentative and Narrative Essays using Graphs
This work investigates whether the development of ideas in writing can be captured by graph properties derived from the text. Focusing on student essays, we represent the essay as a graph, and encode a variety of graph properties including PageRank as features for modeling essay scores related to quality of development. We demonstrate that our approach improves on a stateof-the-art system on th...
متن کاملDiscourse Markers in ESL Personal Narrative and Argumentative Papers: A Qualitative and Quantitative Analysis
This study reports a quantitative and qualitative analysis of the use of discourse markers (DMs) in personal narrative and argumentative papers written by 30 undergraduate students: 15 native speakers (NS) and 15 nonnative speakers (NNS). The study also ascertains whether the frequency and the incorrect use of DMs plays a role in determining the quality of ESL writings. Findings showed that the...
متن کاملDiscourse relations: Genre-specific degrees of overtness in argumentative and narrative discourse
Based on a contrastive approach that compares the argumentative genre of editorial with the narrative genre of personal narrative across two production modes, single-authored data and data elicited in an editing-based task, this paper examines the impact of genre on the realizations of discourse relations, paying particular attention to the argumentative genre and its preferential realizations ...
متن کاملGenerating Argumentative Judgment Determiners
This paper presents a procedure to generate judgment determiners, e.g., many, few. Although such determiners carry very little objective information , they are extensively used in everyday language. The paper presents a precise characterization of a class of such determiners using three semantic tests. A conceptual representation for sets is then derived from this characterization which can ser...
متن کاملHaskell Gets Argumentative
Argumentation theory is an interdisciplinary field studying how conclusions can be reached through logical reasoning. The notion of argument is completely general, including for example legal arguments, scientific arguments, and political arguments. Computational argumentation theory is studied in the context of artificial intelligence, and a number of computational argumentation frameworks hav...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Lili-zeitschrift Fur Literaturwissenschaft Und Linguistik
سال: 2021
ISSN: ['2365-953X', '0049-8653']
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41244-021-00202-6